{"id":11760,"date":"2020-01-01T16:31:46","date_gmt":"2020-01-01T16:31:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/2020\/01\/01\/integrated-assessment-of-sulfate-based-aops-for-pharmaceutical-active-compound-removal-from-wastewater\/"},"modified":"2024-04-18T16:20:32","modified_gmt":"2024-04-18T16:20:32","slug":"integrated-assessment-of-sulfate-based-aops-for-pharmaceutical-active-compound-removal-from-wastewater","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/2020\/01\/01\/integrated-assessment-of-sulfate-based-aops-for-pharmaceutical-active-compound-removal-from-wastewater\/","title":{"rendered":"Integrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t

\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\tAuthors: Sbardella L., Gala I., Comas J., Carbonell S.M., Rodr\u00edguez-Roda I.,Gernjak W. \r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t<\/h4>\r\n\t\t

\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t\tIntegrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater\r\n\t\t\t\r\n\t\t\t<\/h2>\r\n\t\t<\/div>\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been proposed as tertiary treatments for municipal WWTP effluents. UV-activated peroxydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) are viable technological alternatives for treating secondary WWTP effluent containing PhACs. This article examines the feasibility of applying UV\/PDS and UV\/PMS technologies at pilot scale, assessing their energy and cost requirements. In addition, life cycle assessment (LCA) impacts associated with the treatment of 1 m\u00b3 of wastewater with an effective average pharmaceutical active compounds (PhACs) removal of 80% has also been evaluated. Photolysis (UV) treatment alone was not capable of degrading PhACs to a sufficient extent in WWTP secondary effluent. The addition of 0.4 mmol of PDS or PMS, applying 416 mJ\/cm2<\/sup>\u00a0of UV fluence, resulted in average removals of 84% and 85% for UV\/PDS and UV\/PMS, respectively. The electrical energy (kWh) required to degrade the mix of PhACs by one order of magnitude in 1 m\u00b3 of contaminated water was calculated as 0.9 kWh\/m\u00b3\/order and 0.8 kWh\/m\u00b3\/order 4 for UV\/PDS and UV\/PMS, respectively. However, the overall cost, including operation, materials and maintenance, of applying UV\/PDS and UV\/PMS, based on an average PhAC removal of 80%, was 0.088 \u20ac\/m\u00b3 and 0.280 \u20ac\/m\u00b3, respectively. From the sustainability assessment, the factors with the greatest environmental footprint for the UV\/PDS process were chemical production (PDS: 52.9%, PMS: 85%) and electricity consumption (UV\/PDS: 33.4%, UV\/PMS: 11.2). Finally, the normalized environmental impact analysis showed that UV\/PDS was associated with an environmental footprint three times lower than UV\/PMS. The overall assessment revealed that UV\/PDS is preferable to UV\/PMS to remove PhACs in secondary effluents of municipal WWTPs having a lower economic and environmental impact.<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/i><\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tInformaci\u00f3 addicional<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\n\n\n\n\n
Year:<\/strong><\/td>\n2020<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Authors:<\/strong><\/td>\nSbardella L., Gala I., Comas J., Carbonell S.M., Rodr\u00edguez-Roda I.,Gernjak W.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reference:<\/strong><\/td>\nJournal of Cleaner ProductionVolume 2601 July 2020 Article number 121014<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Link:<\/strong><\/td>\nhttp:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2020.121014<\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Authors: Sbardella L., Gala I., Comas J., Carbonell S.M., Rodr\u00edguez-Roda I.,Gernjak W. Integrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater Advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) have been proposed as tertiary treatments for municipal WWTP effluents. UV-activated peroxydisulfate (PDS) and peroxymonosulfate (PMS) are viable technological alternatives for treating secondary WWTP effluent containing PhACs. … Integrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater<\/span>“>Continue reading Integrated assessment of sulfate-based AOPs for pharmaceutical active compound removal from wastewater<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"elementor_header_footer","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[64],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-11760","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-articles-ca"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11760","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11760"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11760\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11761,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11760\/revisions\/11761"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11760"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11760"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lequia-udg.com\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11760"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}